With 24 candidates vying for a spot in the next debate cycle, this round of debates was much like herding cats with the intention to differentiate the field so that only a few cats will be left standing. It wasn’t meant to be sweet. And I wish I could say it was fair to ALL the candidates, but that would be lying. The natural tendency is to gravitate toward the front runners in the center, and this round was no exception.
Moderator Jake Tapper continued to use his divisive questioning strategy used during the second Republican debate in 2016: Direct a question to a candidate asking about an opposing candidate’s position – primarily in the areas of healthcare, foreign policy, and defeating President Trump. The candidate then has to speak to the question (and the opposition) and state his or her own position. And whenever the fellow candidate’s name has been invoked, that candidate has the opportunity to rebut for 30 seconds – or can be asked by the moderator to respond. Ergo, many of these questions would create a bit of back and forth between candidates – the most was nine rebuttals or responses to one question!
There were several tense moments when Ryan challenged Sanders, DeBlasio called out Biden (repeatedly), Gillibrand and Harris ganged up on Biden whereas Sanders and Warren decided to call a temporary truce and not pick on each other.
Moderator Dana Bash would also use this questioning strategy, but her favorite was a direct, no-nonsense approach asking straightforward questions on climate change, the economy, student loans, and equal pay. These kinds of direct questions would get one or two responses but no fireworks.
Moderator Don Lemon favored the comparison game where he would tee up a comment, position, statement, or action from the candidate’s past which is not consistent with the current position around immigration, racial inequality, and criminal justice.
Furthermore, the moderators would ask for a 15-second “point of clarification” to get a wishy-washy candidate to commit to a specific position.
They obviously curated the list of questions ahead of time and practiced the transitions between key segments. All three moderators were sitting at the same table and there were no A/V problems this go around! (whew!)
That’s the idea, at least. David Bauder of AP Media says, “The reality can be much more nuanced. Sometimes the limit is strictly enforced, sometimes not. The most memorable exchange of the first debate — Kamala Harris challenging Joe Biden on busing — happened because producers [aka the moderators] allowed the moment to unfold despite the rules.”
“When a debate actually breaks out in the debate, you just let it go,” said Mark Lukasiewicz, dean of Hofstra University’s School of Communication and a former NBC News executive. “You let it go until it runs out of gas.”
Here’s how they graciously enforced the rules when the time was up (although TVLine said they “cracked the whip loudly and often during the proceedings, earning some admonishment on social media for continually cutting off respondents just as they were getting to the meat of their answer.”)
I didn’t hear the crack of a whip, although I did hear a consistent drumbeat to keep on time. The result? Most of the candidates kept pretty close to the one-minute rule, but none of them kept to the 30 second response rule and they didn’t have to be a butthead about it! (personally, I would like to see the microphone turned off at step 5!
All in all, it was a fairly well run presidential debate, considering the sheer number of candidates. It was too long (almost 3 hours!) with three commercial breaks and two protest moments to add to the action! (BTW, I think it was silly to expect Biden to continue speaking until the disruption had passed).
We get the month of August off and we’ll be back for the next set of debates on September 12 and possibly September 13. In the meantime, stay posted for our predictions once the September moderators are announced. Stay tuned!
For more information, check out my website at www.RulesAnalyst.com. Book me now to comment (live , Zoom, or pre-recorded interviews) on the next debate by calling me at 480.399.8489 or set up a time to talk here.